However the Surprising and

[account_disabled]

The Idea Was, at First Glance, Reasonable: in the Short Term, Normalize the Management of the Company to Catch Up With Its Creditors, Most of Them Small and Medium-sized Farmers, and Recover Some of the Debt That Vicentin Had Contracted With Public Banking; in the Long Term, Create a Witness State Company That Would Allow the State to Intervene in the Opaque Universe of Grain Exports, Argentina's Main.

Wealth and Almost Exclusive Source of Foreign Currency. Unconsulted Way in Which the Decision Was Made, the Lack of Communication With the Actors Involved (Unions, Suppliers, Clients) and the Resistance of the Local Political Power (the Company is Based in UK Mobile Database a Small City) Forced the Government to Go Back. The Opposition Raised the Threat of the Chavista Turn, When in Truth It Was a Bankrupt Company and Not the Beginning of a Nationalization Program, Something That Not Even Kirchnerism in Its Harshest Moments Implemented. But It Was Too Late for Clarifications. The President Was Involved in a Spiral of Denials, New Announcements, "Dialogue.





Tables" and Judicial Rulings That Finally Ended Up Sinking the Project. The Big Problem, However, Was Elsewhere. In Argentina the Chain is Always Cut by the Price of the Dollar. Unlike Other Countries in the Region, Where the Price of the Dollar is Just Another Macroeconomic Variable, in Argentina It is the Main Sign of Economic Stability. The Explanation Appears in the First Courses of Any Argentine Economics Chair: Due to the Unbalanced Nature of Its Productive Structure, Argentina Does Not Genuinely Produce – That is, Through Exports – the Dollars It Needs to Function.